文 | 王紫怡 & 肖诗怡

★全文字数共有3518字 | 预计阅读时间为11分钟★

近日，上海财经大学第二十六届“法律职业发展论坛”成功举办。来自高校、律所、司法实务部门及企业法务界的五十余位嘉宾齐聚一堂，围绕“法学教育、学科建设与就业指导”三大主题展开深入研讨与思想碰撞。

Recently, the 26th “Legal Career Development Forum” of SUFE was convened smoothly. 50 plus distinguished guests from academia, law firms, the judiciary, and the corporate sector gathered to engage in in-depth discussions on three core themes: legal education, discipline development, and career guidance.

上海博爱方本律师事务所高级合伙人金春卿律师，作为积极深耕人工智能法律治理、并为多家欧美与香港上市公司提供合规、投融资与科技监管服务的实务专家，围绕当前国际经济形势变化、人工智能等前沿科技对高等教育与法学学科的冲击、法学课程体系改革、学生职业规划与就业指导等议题展开了多维度、跨领域的对话，并围绕“AI技术变革与国际法治新议题”发表了系统性观点。

Mr Jin Chunqing, Senior Partner of Shanghai Fangben Law Firm, is a seasoned practitioner deeply engaged in AI legal governance, providing compliance, investment, and technology regulatory services to multiple European, U.S. and Hong Kong-listed companies. He engaged in multi-dimensional and cross-disciplinary dialogues on topics ranging from the shifting global economic landscape and the impact of frontier technologies like AI on higher education and legal studies, to curriculum reform and student career guidance. Furthermore, he presented a systematic analysis centered on “AI Technological Transformation and Emerging Issues in International Rule of Law.”

（图1: 金律师发表演讲）（图源：上海财大法学院）

(Photo 1: Lawyer Jin delivering his presentation) (Photo Source: SUFE Law School)

金律师指出，人工智能已不再只是单纯的技术工具，而正在成为国家竞争、产业博弈与国际安全的重要变量。当前，AI技术的“武器化”趋势正逐渐显现，其法律风险已从传统的数据合规、隐私保护、算法歧视，延伸至国家安全、国际冲突与全球治理层面。这一变化，使得AI问题不再只是国内立法议题，而正在演化为一个典型的国际法与比较法议题。结合自身为多家欧美与香港上市公司提供跨境合规、AI风控与数据治理服务的实践经验，金春卿指出，未来企业对“AI法律人才”的需求将呈指数级增长。这类人才不仅要理解法律条文，更必须理解技术逻辑、产业结构与国际博弈格局。

Lawyer Jin pointed out that artificial intelligence is no longer merely a technical tool, but is increasingly becoming a critical variable in national competition, industrial dynamics, and international security. He noted that the trend of AI “weaponization” is becoming evident. Consequently, legal risks are expanding from traditional areas such as data compliance, privacy protection, and algorithmic discrimination to broader domains including national security, international conflicts, and global governance. This shift has transformed AI from a purely domestic legislative matter into a quintessential subject of international and comparative law. Drawing on his practical experience in providing cross-border compliance, AI risk control, and data governance services to numerous Eurpoean, U.S. and Hong Kong-listed companies, Mr. Jin predicted that corporate demand for “AI legal professionals” is set to grow exponentially. Such professionals, he emphasized, must not only possess a solid grasp of legal rules but also deeply understand technological logic, industrial structures, and the dynamics of international competition.

金律师特别向在场学生提出建议：如果选择进入人工智能法领域，应当回到技术的基本原理，而非仅停留在政策文件或舆论层面。真正有竞争力的法律人，应具备“穿透式理解能力”，才能在未来的制度设计与实践中发挥作用。

Lawyer Jin offered specific advice to the students in attendance: those who wish to pursue a career in AI law should return to the fundamental principles of technology, rather than remaining at the level of policy documents or public discourse. Truly competitive legal professionals, he emphasized, shall develop an “penetrating

insight” in order to play a role in future institutional design and practice.